Lately I have observed a Tiny Fact about task distribution and quality of output from your peers. It turns out, that 90% people are good for everything ( provided the job does not require extensive domain expertise). It is also visible that for generic tasks its better to go for in-experienced professionals than the professional ones, since they are a little arrogant due to their experience. On the other hand, the in-experienced ones are cautious of the fact that they have to perform and thus display a better show.
Secondly, throughput decreases with increased experience and success.
I'd like to emphasize that this observation is only useful for common tasks of management and not those involving a level of technical/non-technical detail of the job.
No comments:
Post a Comment